Home/ Supplements/ Choline/ Daily Build

Daily Build

product on market Liquid Genesis Pure Safety: 100/100
100/100

This product looks safe

  • No ingredients exceed tolerable upper intake levels
  • 49% of ingredients have research evidence
A Label Compliance Grade

What the Evidence Says

AI-generated · Qwen 3.6 · methodology

The primary components consist of basic macronutrients and minerals that provide foundational energy and electrolyte balance. Research evidence for these general nutritional building blocks is strong, though the specific formulation lacks specialized active compounds. The profile maintains a high safety rating.

AI-generated summary based on research evidence. Not medical advice.

Label

Product Label

Label for Daily Build
Open Full PDF View on NIH DSLD →
Details

Label Data

1 fl. Oz.
Serving Size
28
Servings
Other Combinations
Product Type
49%
Evidence Coverage
Ingredients

Supplement Facts — Evidence Check

Calories
25 Calorie(s)
Total Fat
1 Gram(s)
Cholesterol
Sodium
35 mg (1% DV)
Total Carbohydrates
6 Gram(s) (2% DV)
Protein
Vitamin A
4000 IU (80% DV)
Vitamin C
400 mg (667% DV)
400 IU (100% DV)
Within RDA (0.7× RDA) 608 studies (A:16, B:251)
100 IU (333% DV)
4.5× RDA — above typical dose (UL: 1000 mg) 179 studies (A:3, B:90)
9 mg (600% DV)
7.5× RDA — above typical dose 76 studies (A:0, B:33)
18 mg (1059% DV)
13.8× RDA — above typical dose 13 studies (A:0, B:1)
18 mg (90% DV)
1.3× RDA — within safe limits 196 studies (A:5, B:63)
18 mg (900% DV)
13.8× RDA — above typical dose (UL: 100 mg) 114 studies (A:3, B:35)
400 mcg (100% DV)
Within RDA (1.0× RDA) 226 studies (A:10, B:105)
500 mcg (8333% DV)
208.3× RDA — above typical dose 139 studies (A:1, B:44)
300 mcg (100% DV)
10.0× RDA — above typical dose 27 studies (A:0, B:11)
120 mg (1200% DV)
24.0× RDA — above typical dose 2 studies — no high-quality reviews
Calcium
100 mg (10% DV)
50 mg (13% DV)
Within RDA (0.1× RDA) 316 studies (A:8, B:159)
150 mcg (100% DV)
Within RDA (1.0× RDA) 245 studies (A:4, B:133)
20 mg (133% DV)
1.8× RDA — within safe limits 263 studies (A:6, B:134)
70 mcg (100% DV)
1.3× RDA — within safe limits 173 studies (A:0, B:67)
2 mg (100% DV)
2.2× RDA — within safe limits 37 studies (A:0, B:11)
5 mg (250% DV)
2.2× RDA — within safe limits 9 studies — no high-quality reviews
200 mcg (167% DV)
5.7× RDA — above typical dose 199 studies (A:1, B:55)
Potassium
250 mg (7% DV)
75 mcg (100% DV)
1.7× RDA — within safe limits 3 studies — no high-quality reviews
Within RDA (0.7× RDA) 179 studies (A:3, B:90)
Market median: 500.0mg (283 products) 174 studies (A:0, B:62)
25 mg
Market median: 500.0mg (9 products) 7 studies — no high-quality reviews
500 mcg
Market median: 0.5mg (6 products) 1 studies (A:0, B:1)
Market median: 125.0mg (294 products) 38 studies (A:1, B:7)
25 mg
Market median: 550.0mg (217 products) 29 studies (A:0, B:5)
1 mg
Market median: 3.0mg (58 products) 3 studies — no high-quality reviews
Pure Trace Mineral Blend
55 mg
Pure Phyto-Antioxidant Complex
175 mg
Market median: 500.0mg (180 products) 5 studies (A:0, B:1)
Pure Botanical Blend
315 mg
Pure Organic Sea Vegetable Blend
170 mg
Pure Bio-Protection Blend
60 mg
Pure Superfruit Plus Blend
12260 mg
Pure Superfood Blend
150 mg
Claims

Label Claims — Verification

Unverified No Claim
Info

Product Information

Formulation Notes

With superfruits

Additional Information

Liquid multi-vitamin, mineral and herbal

Please recycle

Metadata

Product Details

DSLD Entry Date2017-03-24
Product TypeOther Combinations
FormLiquid
DSLD ID70823
Data Updated2026-04-11
Research

Research Evidence

28
Research Sources
47
Avg Quality
11
Clinical Trial
8
Rct
2
Guideline
2
Meta Analysis
2
Regulatory Source
1
Systematic Review
1
Openfda Safety
B Greater Choline-Containing Compounds and Myo-inositol in Treatment-Resistant Versus Responsive Schizophrenia: A 1H-Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Meta-analysis
Meta Analysis Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging 2024 PubMed DOI
B Integrating multi-structure covalent docking with machine-learning consensus scoring enhances potency ranking of human acetylcholinesterase inhibitors.
Guideline Briefings in bioinformatics 2026 PubMed DOI
B Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for functional dyspepsia 2021.
Guideline Journal of gastroenterology 2022 PubMed DOI
B Scientific Opinion on health claims related to choline
Regulatory Source EFSA Journal 2011 DOI
C Effectiveness of nutritional interventions to prevent nonprogressive congenital and perinatal brain injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
Meta Analysis Nutrition reviews 2022 PubMed DOI
C Two methods for assessment of choline status in a randomized crossover study with varying dietary choline intake in people: isotope dilution MS of plasma and in vivo single-voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy of liver.
Rct The American journal of clinical nutrition PubMed DOI
C Choline and betaine concentrations in plasma discriminate levels of dietary choline intake in healthy adults: analysis of a double-blind randomized crossover controlled feeding study.
Rct The American journal of clinical nutrition PubMed DOI
C Nutrient-based therapies for bipolar disorder: a systematic review
Systematic Review Psychotherapy and psychosomatics 2013 PubMed DOI
C The association of betaine, homocysteine and related metabolites with cognitive function in Dutch elderly people
Rct The British journal of nutrition 2007 PubMed
C Differential metabolism of choline supplements in adult volunteers.
Rct European journal of nutrition PubMed DOI
View all evidence for Choline →
Compare

Similar Products

View all Choline products →

This product page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult your healthcare provider before taking any supplement.