Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

source extracted confidence: high 2026-04-09
#humans #antiphospholipid-syndrome #anticoagulants #vitamin-k #administration-oral

Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Alfehaid et al., 2025 | Clin Appl Thromb Hemost | Meta Analysis

Citation

Alfehaid Lama, Alsuhebany Nada, ... Almutairi Abdulaali. Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2025;31:10760296251364269. doi:10.1177/10760296251364269

Abstract

BackgroundAntiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune condition that increases thrombosis risk. Although Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are standard treatment, interest in direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) has grown. Recent studies evaluated DOAC across all APS subgroups. This review updates our understanding of DOAC's efficacy and safety compared to VKA in preventing thrombotic complications, integrating new findings into the literature.MethodsA systematic review across PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, respectively. Meta-analysis calculated odds ratios (OR) using the random effect model for arterial and venous thrombotic and bleeding outcomesResultsOf a total of 2385 records identified, the meta-analysis included 11 studies, comprising 5 RCTs and 7 observational studies, with a combined total of 1813 participants. The analysis revealed no significant difference in the odds of venous thromboembolism (VTE) between DOAC and VKA (OR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.41-1.56). However, a significant increase in thromboembolism recurrence was noted in triple-positive APS patients using DOAC compared to VKA (OR = 3.62; 95% CI 1.10-11.98). The risk of major bleeding was similar between DOAC and VKA (OR = 1.02; 95% CI 0.62-1.68). Additionally, the pooled analysis indicated a higher risk of arterial thrombosis with DOAC (OR = 6.21; 95% CI 2.06-18.76).ConclusionOverall, findings suggest DOAC are comparably safe but increase the risk of arterial thrombosis and VTE in triple-positive APS, favoring warfarin for prophylaxis.

Key Findings

Additionally, the pooled analysis indicated a higher risk of arterial thrombosis with DOAC (OR = 6.21; 95% CI 2.06-18.76).ConclusionOverall, findings suggest DOAC are comparably safe but increase the risk of arterial thrombosis and VTE in triple-positive APS, favoring warfarin for prophylaxis.

Outcomes Measured

  • Requires manual extraction

Population

Field Value
Population See abstract
Sample Size 1813
Age Range See abstract
Condition See abstract

MeSH Terms

  • Humans
  • Antiphospholipid Syndrome
  • Anticoagulants
  • Vitamin K
  • Administration, Oral

Evidence Classification

  • Level: Meta Analysis
  • Publication Types: Journal Article, Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis
  • Vertical: vitamin-k

Provenance

Source extracted via PubMed E-utilities API on 2026-04-09