Effectiveness of pulpotomy in managing carious exposure in mature permanent teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis

source extracted confidence: high 2026-04-09
#humans #calcium-compounds #dental-caries #dental-cements #dental-pulp-exposure

Effectiveness of pulpotomy in managing carious exposure in mature permanent teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Wang et al., 2024 | J Dent | Meta Analysis

Citation

Wang Wenying, Zeng Qian, ... Gu Lisha. Effectiveness of pulpotomy in managing carious exposure in mature permanent teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2024-Nov;150:105392. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105392

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This quantitative systematic review evaluated whether pulpotomy performed with hydraulic calcium silicate cements may be used as an alternative to root canal treatment (RCT) in mature permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. No language restrictions were applied. The search included randomised controlled trials that compared pulpotomy to root canal treatment for managing carious exposure in mature permanent teeth. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were selected based on predetermined inclusion criteria: randomised controlled trials involving mature permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure, using hydraulic calcium silicate cements for pulpotomy. Non-comparative studies, case reports, and trials involving primary or immature permanent teeth were excluded. DATA: Data were extracted on success rates, clinical outcomes, follow-up periods, pain profiles, and potential complications. A meta-analysis was performed, revealing no statistically significant differences in success rates between pulpotomy and RCT. Both interventions demonstrated success rates exceeding 90 % at one-year and two-year follow-up periods. Pain profiles consistently showed lower post-operative pain intensity in the pulpotomy group compared to the RCT group during the first week. Potential complications, such as non-responsive pulp and difficulties in determining pulp vitality, were reported more frequently in the pulpotomy group. CONCLUSIONS: Pulpotomy with bioactive hydraulic calcium silicate cements shows comparable success rates to RCT in managing carious pulp exposure in mature permanent teeth. The results suggest pulpotomy as a viable, less invasive alternative to RCT, particularly in cases where preservation of pulp vitality is paramount. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This systematic review highlights pulpotomy as a less invasive and cost-effective alternative to root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth. With comparable success rates and lower post-operative pain, pulpotomy offers a promising approach to managing carious exposure and preserving tooth vitality.

Key Findings

Pulpotomy with bioactive hydraulic calcium silicate cements shows comparable success rates to RCT in managing carious pulp exposure in mature permanent teeth. The results suggest pulpotomy as a viable, less invasive alternative to RCT, particularly in cases where preservation of pulp vitality is paramount. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This systematic review highlights pulpotomy as a less invasive and cost-effective alternative to root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth. With comparable success

Outcomes Measured

  • Requires manual extraction

Population

Field Value
Population See abstract
Sample Size See abstract
Age Range See abstract
Condition See abstract

MeSH Terms

  • Humans
  • Calcium Compounds
  • Dental Caries
  • Dental Cements
  • Dental Pulp Exposure
  • Dentition, Permanent
  • Postoperative Pain
  • Pulpotomy
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Root Canal Therapy
  • Silicates
  • Treatment Outcome

Evidence Classification

  • Level: Meta Analysis
  • Publication Types: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review
  • Vertical: calcium

Provenance

Source extracted via PubMed E-utilities API on 2026-04-09