Efficacy of vitamin D supplementation on glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Efficacy of vitamin D supplementation on glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Chen et al., 2024 | Diabetes Obes Metab | Meta Analysis
Citation
Chen Wei, Liu Lili, Hu Fang. Efficacy of vitamin D supplementation on glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024-Dec;26(12):5713-5726. doi:10.1111/dom.15941
Abstract
AIM: To assess the effects of vitamin D interventions on glycaemic control in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library for relevant studies. Serum 25(OH)D, fasting blood glucose (FBG), HbA1c, fasting insulin and Homeostasis Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) were analysed. RESULTS: We identified 39 randomized controlled trials involving 2982 subjects. Results showed a significant decline in the vitamin D group, as shown by the FBG weighted mean difference (WMD; -0.49 [95% confidence interval {CI}: -0.69 to -0.28] mmol/L), HbA1c (WMD -0.30% [95% CI: -0.43 to -0.18]), HOMA-IR (WMD -0.39 [95% CI -0.64 to -0.14]) and insulin (WMD -1.31 [95% CI: -2.06 to -0.56] μIU/mL). Subgroup analyses indicated that the effects of vitamin D supplementation on glycaemic control depend on the dosage and duration of supplementation, baseline 25(OH)D levels and the body mass index of patients with T2D. CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D supplementation can significantly reduce serum FBG, HbA1c, HOMA-IR and fasting insulin levels in T2D patients; the effects were especially prominent when vitamin D was given in a short-term, high dosage to patients with a vitamin D deficiency, who were overweight, or had an HbA1c of 8% or higher at baseline. Our study suggests that vitamin D supplements can be recommended as complementary treatment for T2D patients.
Key Findings
We identified 39 randomized controlled trials involving 2982 subjects. Results showed a significant decline in the vitamin D group, as shown by the FBG weighted mean difference (WMD; -0.49 [95% confidence interval {CI}: -0.69 to -0.28] mmol/L), HbA1c (WMD -0.30% [95% CI: -0.43 to -0.18]), HOMA-IR (WMD -0.39 [95% CI -0.64 to -0.14]) and insulin (WMD -1.31 [95% CI: -2.06 to -0.56] μIU/mL). Subgroup analyses indicated that the effects of vitamin D supplementation on glycaemic control depend on the
Outcomes Measured
- Requires manual extraction
Population
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Population | type 2 diabetes |
| Sample Size | 2982 |
| Age Range | See abstract |
| Condition | diabetes |
MeSH Terms
- Humans
- Blood Glucose
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Dietary Supplements
- Glycated Hemoglobin
- Glycemic Control
- Insulin
- Insulin Resistance
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- Treatment Outcome
- Vitamin D
- Vitamin D Deficiency
Evidence Classification
- Level: Meta Analysis
- Publication Types: Systematic Review, Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Vertical: vitamin-d-diabetes
Provenance
- PMID: 39355942
- DOI: 10.1111/dom.15941
- PMCID: Not in PMC
- Verified: 2026-04-09 via PubMed E-utilities API
Source extracted via PubMed E-utilities API on 2026-04-09