Efficacy evaluation of standardized Boswellia serrata extract (AflapinⓇ) in osteoarthritis: A systematic review and sub-group meta-analysis study
Efficacy evaluation of standardized Boswellia serrata extract (AflapinⓇ) in osteoarthritis: A systematic review and sub-group meta-analysis study
Dubey et al., 2024 | Explore (NY) | Meta Analysis
Citation
Dubey Vishal, Kheni Dharmeshkumar, Sureja Varun. Efficacy evaluation of standardized Boswellia serrata extract (AflapinⓇ) in osteoarthritis: A systematic review and sub-group meta-analysis study. Explore (NY). 2024;20(5):102983. doi:10.1016/j.explore.2024.02.001
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a joint disease characterized by pain, inflammation, and physical disability. Boswellia serrata (BS) is widely studied for its effectiveness in OA condition. Our systematic review and meta-analysis study was aimed to evaluate BS extract efficacy in OA. A sub-group analysis was performed to compare the efficacy of a standardized BS extract (AflapinⓇ) with other BS extracts. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials, identified from three online databases, evaluating the effect of BS extracts in OA were included. Quality of studies was assessed using PEDro scale and risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Pooled effect was reported as mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval. Study was conducted as per the Cochrane guidelines (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42023411356). RESULTS: Nine RCTs with 712 participants were included. All studies (except one) were good quality studies. BS supplementation significantly reduced VAS (MD: -10.71; p<0.00001), LFI (MD: -2.99; p<0.00001), WOMAC-pain (MD: -10.69; p<0.0001), WOMAC-stiffness (MD: -5.49; p<0.00001), and WOMAC-function (MD: -10.69; p<0.00001) scores compared to control therapy. By sub-group analysis, AflapinⓇ supplementation showed greater reduction in VAS (MD: -16.09 vs -4.68), LFI (MD: -3.81 vs -2.01), WOMAC-pain (MD: -18.68 vs -7.07), WOMAC-stiffness (MD: -14.25 vs -3.78), and WOMAC-function (MD: -14.99 vs -8.41) scores as compared to other BS therapies. CONCLUSIONS: BS supplementation is effective OA symptomatic management. Sub-group analysis revealed that AflapinⓇ supplementation may be better in improving the symptoms of OA which needs to be confirmed by more comparative clinical studies.
Key Findings
Nine RCTs with 712 participants were included. All studies (except one) were good quality studies. BS supplementation significantly reduced VAS (MD: -10.71; p<0.00001), LFI (MD: -2.99; p<0.00001), WOMAC-pain (MD: -10.69; p<0.0001), WOMAC-stiffness (MD: -5.49; p<0.00001), and WOMAC-function (MD: -10.69; p<0.00001) scores compared to control therapy. By sub-group analysis, AflapinⓇ supplementation showed greater reduction in VAS (MD: -16.09 vs -4.68), LFI (MD: -3.81 vs -2.01), WOMAC-pain (MD: -18.
Outcomes Measured
- Requires manual extraction
Population
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Population | See abstract |
| Sample Size | 712 |
| Age Range | See abstract |
| Condition | inflammation |
MeSH Terms
- Humans
- Boswellia
- Osteoarthritis
- Phytotherapy
- Plant Extracts
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Evidence Classification
- Level: Meta Analysis
- Publication Types: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review
- Vertical: boswellia
Provenance
- PMID: 38365549
- DOI: 10.1016/j.explore.2024.02.001
- PMCID: Not in PMC
- Verified: 2026-04-09 via PubMed E-utilities API
Source extracted via PubMed E-utilities API on 2026-04-09