Diagnostic Accuracy of Creatine Kinase Isoenzyme-MM Test in Newborn Screening for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Diagnostic Accuracy of Creatine Kinase Isoenzyme-MM Test in Newborn Screening for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Tang et al., 2024 | Pediatr Neurol | Meta Analysis
Citation
Tang Liang, Pan Mengwen, Wu Fan. Diagnostic Accuracy of Creatine Kinase Isoenzyme-MM Test in Newborn Screening for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pediatr Neurol. 2024-Apr;153:84-91. doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2024.01.010
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the creatine kinase isoenzyme-MM (CK-MM) test in newborn screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted up to October 31, 2022, in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus Database. To evaluate the diagnostic value, the sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), area under the curve (AUC), and Q∗ index were pooled. Threshold effect followed by subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to explore the source of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis was used to verify the robustness of the findings. RESULTS: A total seven studies with 248,853 newborns was included in our meta-analysis. The pooled SEN and SPE were 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89∼1.00) and 1.00 (95% CI: 1.00 to 1.00), respectively; the PLR and NLR were 1004.59 (95% CI: 251.37∼4014.91) and 0.13 (95% CI: 0.05∼0.34), respectively; the DOR was 877.96 (95% CI: 983.24∼78,366.32); the AUC and Q index were 0.8683 and 0.9326, respectively. Sensitivity analysis showed that two studies had an impact on the pooled results and mainly contributed to the heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: CK-MM test demonstrated high accuracy in newborn screening for DMD and may be a valuable alternative in the early diagnosis of the disease followed by confirmatory genetic testing.
Key Findings
A total seven studies with 248,853 newborns was included in our meta-analysis. The pooled SEN and SPE were 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89∼1.00) and 1.00 (95% CI: 1.00 to 1.00), respectively; the PLR and NLR were 1004.59 (95% CI: 251.37∼4014.91) and 0.13 (95% CI: 0.05∼0.34), respectively; the DOR was 877.96 (95% CI: 983.24∼78,366.32); the AUC and Q index were 0.8683 and 0.9326, respectively. Sensitivity analysis showed that two studies had an impact on the pooled results and mainly cont
Outcomes Measured
- Requires manual extraction
Population
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Population | See abstract |
| Sample Size | See abstract |
| Age Range | See abstract |
| Condition | See abstract |
MeSH Terms
- Humans
- Infant, Newborn
- Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne
- Neonatal Screening
- Isoenzymes
- Sensitivity and Specificity
- Creatine Kinase
Evidence Classification
- Level: Meta Analysis
- Publication Types: Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review, Journal Article
- Vertical: creatine
Provenance
- PMID: 38350306
- DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2024.01.010
- PMCID: Not in PMC
- Verified: 2026-04-09 via PubMed E-utilities API
Source extracted via PubMed E-utilities API on 2026-04-09