Prevention of nNon-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants-Related Gastrointestinal Bleeding With Acid Suppressants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Dong et al., 2022 | Clin Appl Thromb Hemost | Meta Analysis

Citation

Dong Yongqi, He Song, ... Zhou Zhihang. Prevention of nNon-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants-Related Gastrointestinal Bleeding With Acid Suppressants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2022;28:10760296211064897. doi:10.1177/10760296211064897

Abstract

Whether the use of acid suppressants can reduce non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs)-related gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) remains unclear. To systemically evaluate the effect of acid suppressants on the risk of GIB in patients treated with NOACs. All related studies were searched in four databases (Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science) from their establishment to August 10, 2021. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was used to identify studies and Stata 16.0 software was used for meta-analysis, including sensitivity and subgroup analysis. Six retrospective cohort studies were included in this study. The use of acid suppressants significantly reduced the GIB risk in patients taking NOACs, with an overall relative risk (RR) of 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61-0.82; P < 0.001; I2 = 56.3%). This trend of reduced risk for GIB in NOACs was more significant in upper GIB (UGIB; RR: 0.45; 95%CI: 0.22-0.90; P = 0.025; I2 = 71.1%). The reduction was stronger for dabigatran than for rivaroxaban and apixaban. The least reduction in the risk of GIB with acid suppressant co-therapy was rivaroxaban (dabigatran: RR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.45-0.62; P = <0.001; I2 = 39.8%; apixaban: RR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.54-0.84; P = <0.001; I2 = 0; rivaroxaban: RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.66-0.81; P = <0.001; I2 = 37.6%). The included studies revealed the protective effect of acid suppressants against NOACs-related GIB, especially in the upper gastrointestinal tract. The protective effect was even stronger in patients using dabigatran than in those using Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban).

Key Findings

The protective effect was even stronger in patients using dabigatran than in those using Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban).

Outcomes Measured

  • Requires manual extraction

Population

Field Value
Population See abstract
Sample Size See abstract
Age Range See abstract
Condition See abstract

MeSH Terms

  • Administration, Oral
  • Anticoagulants
  • Atrial Fibrillation
  • Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
  • Humans
  • Stroke

Evidence Classification

  • Level: Meta Analysis
  • Publication Types: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review
  • Vertical: vitamin-k

Provenance


Source extracted via PubMed E-utilities API on 2026-04-09