Effects of Vitamin C Supplementation on Glycemic Control and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in People With Type 2 Diabetes: A GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Effects of Vitamin C Supplementation on Glycemic Control and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in People With Type 2 Diabetes: A GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Mason et al., 2021 | Diabetes Care | Meta Analysis
Citation
Mason Shaun A, Keske Michelle A, Wadley Glenn D. Effects of Vitamin C Supplementation on Glycemic Control and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in People With Type 2 Diabetes: A GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Diabetes Care. 2021-Feb;44(2):618-630. doi:10.2337/dc20-1893
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that vitamin C supplementation could be a potential therapy in type 2 diabetes. However, its effectiveness and evidence quality require further evaluation. PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of oral vitamin C supplementation in improving glycemic control, cardiovascular risk factors, and oxidative stress in people with type 2 diabetes. DATA SOURCES: Databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library) and clinical trial registries were searched for randomized controlled trials up to 8 September 2020. STUDY SELECTION: Trials in adults with type 2 diabetes were included. Trials were excluded if supplements were not exclusive to vitamin C and if <2 weeks in duration. DATA EXTRACTION: Primary outcomes were HbA1c, glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, and blood pressure (BP). Data were extracted for changes in outcomes between vitamin C and control groups. Evidence certainty was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methods. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-eight studies (N = 1,574 participants) were included in the review. Outcomes that changed to a statistically and clinically significant extent with vitamin C were systolic BP (mean difference -6.27 [95% CI -9.60, -2.96] mmHg; P = 0.0002), with moderate evidence certainty, and HbA1c (-0.54% [-0.90, -0.17]; P = 0.004) and diastolic BP (-3.77 [-6.13, -1.42] mmHg; P = 0.002) with very low evidence certainty. LIMITATIONS: Studies were predominantly short term (<6 months) with a small number of participants (n < 100). CONCLUSIONS: While evidence from short-term studies suggests that vitamin C supplementation may improve glycemic control and BP in people with type 2 diabetes, vitamin C supplementation cannot currently be recommended as a therapy until larger, long-term, and high-quality trials confirm these findings.
Key Findings
While evidence from short-term studies suggests that vitamin C supplementation may improve glycemic control and BP in people with type 2 diabetes, vitamin C supplementation cannot currently be recommended as a therapy until larger, long-term, and high-quality trials confirm these findings.
Outcomes Measured
- blood pressure
- systolic blood pressure
- diastolic blood pressure
Population
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Population | See abstract |
| Sample Size | 1574 |
| Age Range | See abstract |
| Condition | blood pressure |
MeSH Terms
- Adult
- Ascorbic Acid
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Dietary Supplements
- Glycemic Control
- Heart Disease Risk Factors
- Humans
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- Risk Factors
Evidence Classification
- Level: Meta Analysis
- Publication Types: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review
- Vertical: vitamin-c-cardiovascular
Provenance
- PMID: 33472962
- DOI: 10.2337/dc20-1893
- PMCID: Not in PMC
- Verified: 2026-04-09 via PubMed E-utilities API
Source extracted via PubMed E-utilities API on 2026-04-09