Association Between the Overall Risk of Prostate Cancer and Use of Calcium Channel Blockers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Association Between the Overall Risk of Prostate Cancer and Use of Calcium Channel Blockers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Yang et al., 2020 | Clin Ther | Meta Analysis
Citation
Yang Hui, Yu Yahui, ... Liu Lihong. Association Between the Overall Risk of Prostate Cancer and Use of Calcium Channel Blockers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Ther. 2020-Sep;42(9):1715-1727.e2. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.06.021
Abstract
PURPOSE: Although calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are now commonly prescribed to treat hypertension as a first-line drug therapy, their impact on prostate cancer (PCa) is unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine the association between CCB use and the overall risk of PCa. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched up to December 26, 2019, stratified according to statistical method of outcome [odd ratios (ORs), relative ratios (RRs), hazard ratios (HRs)] and cumulative duration of CCB use. The quality assessment of included studies was evaluated by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Fixed effects models were used to study the association between CCB use and the risk of PCa. Between-study heterogeneity was quantified by using Cochran's Q-statistic and I2 statistics. Sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding the studies one by one, and publication bias was analyzed by using funnel plots. FINDINGS: Nineteen studies with 1,418,407 patients were identified for inclusion in the meta-analysis, which was based on the comparison of cohort studies, nested case-control studies, and case-control studies. Pooled estimates showed a RR of 1.08 (95% CI, 1.05-1.11; P < 0.00001) and a HR of 1.07 (95% CI, 1.02-1.13; P = 0.008) for association between CCB use and the risk of PCa. In addition, the results of subgroup analysis showed that CCB users of <5 years had an 8% increased overall risk of PCa (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04-1.12; P = 0.0001), and CCB users of 5-10 years had a 13% increased overall risk of PCa (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.04-1.23; P = 0.003). IMPLICATIONS: CCB use had a tendency to increase the overall risk of PCa, and cumulative duration of CCB use might also be positively correlated with the overall risk of PCa.
Key Findings
Nineteen studies with 1,418,407 patients were identified for inclusion in the meta-analysis, which was based on the comparison of cohort studies, nested case-control studies, and case-control studies. Pooled estimates showed a RR of 1.08 (95% CI, 1.05-1.11; P < 0.00001) and a HR of 1.07 (95% CI, 1.02-1.13; P = 0.008) for association between CCB use and the risk of PCa. In addition, the results of subgroup analysis showed that CCB users of <5 years had an 8% increased overall risk of PCa (RR, 1.0
Outcomes Measured
- Requires manual extraction
Population
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Population | See abstract |
| Sample Size | 1418407 |
| Age Range | 5-10 years |
| Condition | hypertension |
MeSH Terms
- Calcium Channel Blockers
- Humans
- Hypertension
- Male
- Prostatic Neoplasms
Evidence Classification
- Level: Meta Analysis
- Publication Types: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review
- Vertical: calcium
Provenance
- PMID: 32807506
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.06.021
- PMCID: Not in PMC
- Verified: 2026-04-09 via PubMed E-utilities API
Source extracted via PubMed E-utilities API on 2026-04-09