Prevalence of gastrointestinal malignancy in iron deficiency without anaemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Prevalence of gastrointestinal malignancy in iron deficiency without anaemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Alexandre et al., 2020 | Eur J Intern Med | Meta Analysis
Citation
Alexandre Leo, Manning Charelle, Chan Simon S M. Prevalence of gastrointestinal malignancy in iron deficiency without anaemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Intern Med. 2020-Feb;72:27-33. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2019.12.015
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency anaemia is associated with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy and is an indication for GI investigations. However, the relevance of iron deficiency without anaemia (IDWA) and the underlying risks of GI malignancy are uncertain. Therefore, the aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of GI malignancy in patients with IDWA overall and in clinically relevant subgroups. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for studies that reported on the prevalence or risk of GI malignancy in patients with confirmed IDWA. We performed a random effects meta-analysis of proportions and assessed statistical heterogeneity using the I2 statistic. RESULTS: A total of 1923 citations were screened and 5 studies (4 retrospective cohorts, 1 prospective cohort) comprising 3329 participants with IDWA were included in the meta-analysis. Overall pooled random-effects estimates for prevalence of GI malignancy in those with IDWA were low (0.38%, 95% CI 0.00%-1.84%, I2 = 87.7%). Older patients (2.58%, 95% CI 0.00%-8.77%); non-screening populations (2.45%, 95% CI 0.16%-6.39%) and men and post-menopausal women (0.90%, 95% CI 0.11%-3.23%) with IDWA were at increased risk of GI malignancy compared to younger patients (0.00%, 95% CI 0.00%-0.21%); screened populations (0.24%, 95% CI 0.00%-1.10%) and pre-menopausal women (0.00%, 95% CI 0.00%-1.05%). CONCLUSION: Overall, IDWA is associated with a low risk of GI malignancy. Older patients and non-screening populations are at elevated risk and require GI investigations. Those not in these subgroups have a lower risk of GI malignancy and may wish to be monitored following discussion of the risk and potential benefits of GI investigations.
Key Findings
A total of 1923 citations were screened and 5 studies (4 retrospective cohorts, 1 prospective cohort) comprising 3329 participants with IDWA were included in the meta-analysis. Overall pooled random-effects estimates for prevalence of GI malignancy in those with IDWA were low (0.38%, 95% CI 0.00%-1.84%, I2 = 87.7%). Older patients (2.58%, 95% CI 0.00%-8.77%); non-screening populations (2.45%, 95% CI 0.16%-6.39%) and men and post-menopausal women (0.90%, 95% CI 0.11%-3.23%) with IDWA were at incr
Outcomes Measured
- Requires manual extraction
Population
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Population | idwa overall and in |
| Sample Size | 3329 |
| Age Range | See abstract |
| Condition | deficiency |
MeSH Terms
- Anemia, Iron-Deficiency
- Female
- Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
- Humans
- Male
- Prevalence
- Prospective Studies
- Retrospective Studies
Evidence Classification
- Level: Meta Analysis
- Publication Types: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Systematic Review
- Vertical: iron
Provenance
- PMID: 31932190
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2019.12.015
- PMCID: Not in PMC
- Verified: 2026-04-09 via PubMed E-utilities API
Source extracted via PubMed E-utilities API on 2026-04-09