Effects of vitamin C supplementation on glycaemic control: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Ashor et al., 2017 | Eur J Clin Nutr | Meta Analysis

Citation

Ashor A W, Werner A D, ... Siervo M. Effects of vitamin C supplementation on glycaemic control: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2017-Dec;71(12):1371-1380. doi:10.1038/ejcn.2017.24

Abstract

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have observed contrasting results on the effects of vitamin C on circulating biomarkers of glycaemic and insulin regulation. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs testing the effect of vitamin C administration on glucose, HbA1c and insulin concentrations. Four databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library) were used to retrieve RCTs published from inception until April 2016 and testing the effects of vitamin C in adult participants. The screening of 2008 articles yielded 22 eligible studies (937 participants). Overall, vitamin C did not modify glucose, HbA1c and insulin concentrations. However, subgroup analyses showed that vitamin C significantly reduced glucose concentrations (-0.44 mmol/l, 95% CI: -0.81, -0.07, P=0.01) in patients with type 2 diabetes and in interventions with a duration greater than 30 days (-0.53%, 95% CI: -0.79, -0.10, P=0.02). Vitamin C administration had greater effects on fasting (-13.63 pmol/l, 95% CI: -22.73, -4.54, P<0.01) compared to postprandial insulin concentration. Meta-regression analyses showed that age was a modifier of the effect of vitamin C on insulin concentration. Furthermore, the effect size was associated with baseline BMI and plasma glucose levels, and with the duration of the intervention. In conclusion, greater reduction in glucose concentrations observed in patients with diabetes, older individuals and with more prolonged supplementation. Personalised interventions with vitamin C may represent a feasible future strategy to enhance benefits and efficacy of interventions. Nevertheless, results need to be interpreted cautiously due to limitations in the primary studies analysed.

Key Findings

Nevertheless, results need to be interpreted cautiously due to limitations in the primary studies analysed.

Outcomes Measured

  • Requires manual extraction

Population

Field Value
Population adult participants
Sample Size 937
Age Range See abstract
Condition diabetes

MeSH Terms

  • Ascorbic Acid
  • Blood Glucose
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
  • Dietary Supplements
  • Glycated Hemoglobin
  • Humans
  • Insulin
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Sensitivity and Specificity

Evidence Classification

  • Level: Meta Analysis
  • Publication Types: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review
  • Vertical: vitamin-c

Provenance


Source extracted via PubMed E-utilities API on 2026-04-09