How effective is diluted povidone-iodine in preventing periprosthetic joint infection in total joint arthroplasty (TJA)? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
How effective is diluted povidone-iodine in preventing periprosthetic joint infection in total joint arthroplasty (TJA)? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Ebrahimzadeh et al., 2023 | BMC Musculoskelet Disord | Meta Analysis
Citation
Ebrahimzadeh Mohammad-H, Safdari Mohammad-R, ... Daliri Mahla. How effective is diluted povidone-iodine in preventing periprosthetic joint infection in total joint arthroplasty (TJA)? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023-May-25;24(1):416. doi:10.1186/s12891-023-06548-x
Abstract
PURPOSE: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication with total joint arthroplasty (TJA), that necessitates reoperation. Pre-closure irrigation with dilute povidone-iodine (PI) is among the preventive measures, but its efficiency is still controversial. As a result, the focus of this systematic review and meta-analysis is on the effect of dilute PI wound irrigation in the prevention of PJI following TJA. METHODS: We systematically reviewed and analyzed articles that compared PI with other agents in terms of PJI rate after TJA, searching Medline, Scopus, Web of science, and Cochrane databases. A number of 13 papers including 63,950 patients in total, were finally considered in qualitative and quantitative assessments. We have also further assessed review articles. RESULTS: In comparison with normal saline (NS), PI reduced post-operative infection rate (OR: 0.44; CI 95%: 0.34-0.56). However, there was no difference between PI and chlorhexidine (CHG) (OR: 1.61; CI 95%: 0.83-3.09)) or undetermined comparators (OR: 1.08; CI 95%: 0.67-1.76). CONCLUSION: PI irrigation seems an efficient preventive measure for post-operative PJI and would seem to be the most feasible for TJA protocol.
Key Findings
In comparison with normal saline (NS), PI reduced post-operative infection rate (OR: 0.44; CI 95%: 0.34-0.56). However, there was no difference between PI and chlorhexidine (CHG) (OR: 1.61; CI 95%: 0.83-3.09)) or undetermined comparators (OR: 1.08; CI 95%: 0.67-1.76).
Outcomes Measured
- Requires manual extraction
Population
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Population | See abstract |
| Sample Size | 63950 |
| Age Range | See abstract |
| Condition | See abstract |
MeSH Terms
- Humans
- Povidone-Iodine
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Prosthesis-Related Infections
- Arthritis, Infectious
- Surgical Wound Infection
- Retrospective Studies
Evidence Classification
- Level: Meta Analysis
- Publication Types: Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review, Journal Article
- Vertical: iodine
Provenance
- PMID: 37231378
- DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06548-x
- PMCID: PMC10210324
- Verified: 2026-04-09 via PubMed E-utilities API
Source extracted via PubMed E-utilities API on 2026-04-09