Allium Vegetables, Garlic Supplements, and Risk of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Zhang et al., 2021 | Front Nutr | Systematic Review

Citation

Zhang Qifan, Zhao Qing, ... Zhu Yan. Allium Vegetables, Garlic Supplements, and Risk of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Nutr. 2021;8:746944. doi:10.3389/fnut.2021.746944

Abstract

PURPOSE: The role of allium vegetables or garlic supplements on reducing cancer risk was inconsistent between laboratory study findings and related epidemiologic studies. METHODS: Studies assessing the effect of allium vegetables and garlic supplement consumption on cancer risk were included in our meta-analysis. We used fixed- or random-effects models to pool effect measures to evaluate the highest and lowest consumption. A dose-response regression analysis was used to assess the association between allium vegetables, garlic supplements, and cancer risk. RESULTS: In a pooled analysis of 22 studies with 25 reports on allium vegetables, a high consumption of allium vegetables showed no significant association with cancer risk (relative risk [RR] = 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-1.03) in a fixed-effects model. Similarly, garlic supplements were not found to be significantly associated with an increased risk of cancer (RR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.84-1.12) in a random-effects model involving a pooled analysis of 10 studies with 11 reports. Consumption of allium vegetables did not significantly correspond with cancer risk (P for nonlinearity = 0.958, P for linearity = 0.907). CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, we found no evidence that higher consumption of allium vegetables or garlic supplements reduced the risk of cancer; however, this finding requires further validation. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, identifier: CRD42021246947.

Key Findings

In a pooled analysis of 22 studies with 25 reports on allium vegetables, a high consumption of allium vegetables showed no significant association with cancer risk (relative risk [RR] = 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-1.03) in a fixed-effects model. Similarly, garlic supplements were not found to be significantly associated with an increased risk of cancer (RR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.84-1.12) in a random-effects model involving a pooled analysis of 10 studies with 11 reports. Consumption of all

Outcomes Measured

  • Requires manual extraction

Population

Field Value
Population See abstract
Sample Size 22
Age Range See abstract
Condition See abstract

MeSH Terms

  • No MeSH terms indexed

Evidence Classification

  • Level: Systematic Review
  • Publication Types: Systematic Review, Journal Article
  • Vertical: garlic

Provenance


Source extracted via PubMed E-utilities API on 2026-04-09