The use of vitamin K supplementation to achieve INR stability: a systematic review and meta-analysis
The use of vitamin K supplementation to achieve INR stability: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Kramps et al., 2013 | J Am Assoc Nurse Pract | Meta Analysis
Citation
Kramps Melissa, Flanagan Abigail, Smaldone Arlene. The use of vitamin K supplementation to achieve INR stability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2013-Oct;25(10):535-544. doi:10.1111/1745-7599.12022
Abstract
PURPOSE: Systematically review and quantitatively synthesize evidence on use of oral vitamin K supplementation in reducing international normalized ratio (INR) variability. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Turning Research Into Practice (TRIP), Web of Science were searched for studies meeting predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Five studies meeting criteria (three randomized trials, one quasi-experimental pre-post study, one retrospective case series) were appraised for quality and data synthesized by two reviewers. Pooled effect size of time in INR therapeutic range (TTR) was estimated using random effects meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Pooled effect size representing data from four studies (678 subjects) was 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.03-0.59 (Cochran Q = 7.1; p = .07; I(2) = 57.8) and favored vitamin K supplementation. Given wide variability among individual studies, there is not enough evidence to advise for or against the routine use of vitamin K supplementation to achieve INR stability. However, evidence does suggest that it may be of some benefit for some patients with INR instability. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: There is insufficient evidence to support routine supplementation with vitamin K in patients on chronic anticoagulation therapy but select patients, particularly those with persistent INR instability despite known adherence to regimen and no dietary or drug-drug interactions, may benefit from the intervention. Future research is warranted.
Key Findings
Pooled effect size representing data from four studies (678 subjects) was 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.03-0.59 (Cochran Q = 7.1; p = .07; I(2) = 57.8) and favored vitamin K supplementation. Given wide variability among individual studies, there is not enough evidence to advise for or against the routine use of vitamin K supplementation to achieve INR stability. However, evidence does suggest that it may be of some benefit for some patients with INR instability. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Ther
Outcomes Measured
- Requires manual extraction
Population
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Population | inr instability |
| Sample Size | 678 |
| Age Range | See abstract |
| Condition | See abstract |
MeSH Terms
- Anticoagulants
- Dietary Supplements
- Humans
- International Normalized Ratio
- Vitamin K
- Vitamins
Evidence Classification
- Level: Meta Analysis
- Publication Types: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review
- Vertical: vitamin-k
Provenance
- PMID: 24170485
- DOI: 10.1111/1745-7599.12022
- PMCID: Not in PMC
- Verified: 2026-04-09 via PubMed E-utilities API
Source extracted via PubMed E-utilities API on 2026-04-09