Red ginseng for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Red ginseng for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Kim et al., 2011 | Chin J Integr Med | Meta Analysis
Citation
Kim Sina, Shin Byung-Cheul, ... Ernst Edzard. Red ginseng for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Chin J Integr Med. 2011-Dec;17(12):937-44. doi:10.1007/s11655-011-0937-2
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Red ginseng (RG, Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer) is one of the widely used herbs for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). However, no systematic review of the effectiveness of RG for type 2 DM is available. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the current evidence for the effectiveness of RG in patients with type 2 DM. METHODS: Electronic searches of 14 electronic databases were conducted without language restrictions. All randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with RG as a treatment for type 2 DM were considered for inclusion. Their methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane criteria. RESULTS: Four RCTs met our inclusion criteria. Their methodological quality was variable. Three of the RCTs compared the effectiveness of RG with placebo. The meta-analysis of these data failed to favor RG over placebo for fasting plasma glucose (FPG) [n =76, weighted mean difference (WMD): -0.43 mmol/L; 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.16 to 0.30, =0.25] and fasting plasma insulin (FPI) (n =76, WMD: -8.43 pmol/L; 95% CI: -19.54 to 2.68, P =0.14) for 12 weeks of treatment. One RCT compared the effects of RG with no treatment. The results did not suggest favorable effects of RG on FPG, hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) or 2-h blood glucose after a meal (PP2h). CONCLUSIONS: The evidence for the effectiveness of RG in controlling glucose in type 2 DM is not convincing. Few included studies with various treatment regimens prohibit definitive conclusions. More rigorous studies are needed to clarify the effects of RG on this condition.
Key Findings
Four RCTs met our inclusion criteria. Their methodological quality was variable. Three of the RCTs compared the effectiveness of RG with placebo. The meta-analysis of these data failed to favor RG over placebo for fasting plasma glucose (FPG) [n =76, weighted mean difference (WMD): -0.43 mmol/L; 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.16 to 0.30, =0.25] and fasting plasma insulin (FPI) (n =76, WMD: -8.43 pmol/L; 95% CI: -19.54 to 2.68, P =0.14) for 12 weeks of treatment. One RCT compared the effects of
Outcomes Measured
- Requires manual extraction
Population
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Population | type 2 dm |
| Sample Size | 76 |
| Age Range | See abstract |
| Condition | diabetes |
MeSH Terms
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Humans
- Panax
- Phytotherapy
- Plant Extracts
- Publication Bias
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- Risk Factors
- Treatment Outcome
Evidence Classification
- Level: Meta Analysis
- Publication Types: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review
- Vertical: ginseng
Provenance
- PMID: 22139546
- DOI: 10.1007/s11655-011-0937-2
- PMCID: Not in PMC
- Verified: 2026-04-09 via PubMed E-utilities API
Source extracted via PubMed E-utilities API on 2026-04-09