Iron Supplementation for Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia in Patients Receiving Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents

Mhaskar et al., 2016 | JAMA Oncol | Meta Analysis

Citation

Mhaskar Rahul, Djulbegovic Benjamin. Iron Supplementation for Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia in Patients Receiving Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents. JAMA Oncol. 2016-Nov-01;2(11):1499-1500. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1864

Abstract

CLINICAL QUESTION: What are the benefits and harms of iron supplementation alone and as an adjunct to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) compared with ESA alone in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia? BOTTOM LINE: Addition of iron to ESAs improves hematopoietic response, reduces the need for red blood cell transfusions, increases hemoglobin levels, and seems to be well tolerated. The subgroup analyses suggest the superiority of parenteral iron over oral iron supplementation in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia.

Key Findings

The subgroup analyses suggest the superiority of parenteral iron over oral iron supplementation in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia.

Outcomes Measured

  • Requires manual extraction

Population

Field Value
Population See abstract
Sample Size See abstract
Age Range See abstract
Condition See abstract

MeSH Terms

  • Anemia
  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Dietary Supplements
  • Erythropoiesis
  • Erythropoietin
  • Hematinics
  • Humans
  • Induction Chemotherapy
  • Iron
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Evidence Classification

  • Level: Meta Analysis
  • Publication Types: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Meta-Analysis
  • Vertical: iron-anemia

Provenance


Source extracted via PubMed E-utilities API on 2026-04-09